Objective: To characterize the pattern, content, and management of after-ho
urs telephone interactions between obstetrician-gynecologists and patients.
Methods: In a prospective observational study, 12 resident and nine private
physicians practicing obstetrics and gynecology completed data cards for a
fter-hours telephone interactions with patients. Chief complaints were cate
gorized as related to either women's health or primary care and on whether
women were pregnant postpartum or not pregnant. Triage dispositions (evalua
te now, office follow-up, or home care) were compared between groups. Women
also were asked what they would have done if they had been unable to conta
ct their physicians by telephone.
Results: One hundred ninety-two of 276 calls evaluated (69.6%) were from pr
egnant women, 20 (7.2%) were from postpartum women, and 64 (23.3%) were fro
m nonpregnant women. Calls were related to primary care health issues in 24
.1% (n = 45) of pregnant women, 40% (n = 8) of postpartum women, and 28.1%
(n = 18) of nonpregnant women. There were no differences between residents
and private physicians in the proportion of women triaged to immediate eval
uation for pregnancy (35.1% [n = 40] versus 41.9% [n = 31], P = .74) or pos
tpartum (11.1% [n = 1] versus 10% [n = 1], P = .96) problems. Among 139 wom
en triaged to office follow-up, 41% (n = 57) would have come to the hospita
l for emergency evaluation if they had been unable to reach their physician
s.
Conclusion: Resident and private obstetrician-gynecologists provide primary
care and women's health care advice during after-hours telephone calls fro
m patients. More than one third of after-hours telephone calls from pregnan
t women are triaged to immediate evaluation. (Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:459-64
. (C) 2000 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.).