Seafood processing in South Africa: a study of working practices, occupational health services and allergic health problems in the industry

Citation
Mf. Jeebhay et al., Seafood processing in South Africa: a study of working practices, occupational health services and allergic health problems in the industry, OCCUP MED-O, 50(6), 2000, pp. 406-413
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Envirnomentale Medicine & Public Health
Journal title
OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE-OXFORD
ISSN journal
09627480 → ACNP
Volume
50
Issue
6
Year of publication
2000
Pages
406 - 413
Database
ISI
SICI code
0962-7480(200008)50:6<406:SPISAA>2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
The work practices, occupational health services and allergic health proble ms among workplaces which process seafood in Western Cape province of South Africa were examined. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 68 workp laces that were sent a self-administered postal survey questionnaire. Workp laces reporting a high prevalence of work-related symptoms associated with seafood exposure were also inspected. Forty-one (60%) workplaces responded to the questionnaire, The workforce consisted mainly of women (62%) and 31% were seasonal workers. Common seafoods processed were bony fish (76%) and rock lobster (34%). Major work processes involved freezing (71%), cutting ( 63%) and degutting (58%). Only 45% of workplaces provided an on-site occupa tional health service and 58% of workplaces conducted medical surveillance. Positive trends were observed between workplace size and activities such a s occupational health service provision (P = 0.002), medical surveillance p rogrammes (P = 0.055) and reporting work-related symptoms (P = 0.016). None of the workplaces had industrial hygiene surveillance programmes to evalua te the effects of exposure to seafood. Common work-related symptoms include d skin rashes (78%), asthma (7%) and other non-specific allergies (15%). Th e annual prevalence of work-related skin symptoms reported per workplace wa s substantially higher for skin (0 - 100%) than for asthmatic (0 -5%) sympt oms. The relatively low prevalence of employer-reported asthmatic symptoms, when compared to epidemiological studies using direct investigator assessm ent of individual health status, suggests likely under-detection. This can be attributed to under-provision and under-development of occupational heal th surveillance programmes in workplaces with less than 200 workers. This i s compounded further by the lack of specific statutory guidelines for the e valuation and control of bio-aerosols in South African workplaces.