Mr. Foolad et al., Comparison of field, greenhouse, and detached-leaflet evaluations of tomato germ plasm for early blight resistance, PLANT DIS, 84(9), 2000, pp. 967-972
Twenty-nine tomato genotypes (cultivars, breeding lines, and plant introduc
tions), representing three Lycopersicon species, were evaluated for resista
nce to early blight (EB) caused by the fungus Alternaria solani. Evaluation
s were conducted in replicated trials in multiple years under field and gre
enhouse conditions (with whole plants) and in growth chamber (with detached
leaflets). In the field experiments, plants were evaluated for disease sym
ptoms, and area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC) and final percent
defoliation were determined. In the greenhouse experiments, plants were eva
luated for percent defoliation following spray-inoculation with isolates of
A. solani. In the growth chamber experiments, lesion radius, rate of lesio
n expansion, and final disease severity were determined for individual deta
ched leaflets inoculated with isolates of A. solani. There were significant
differences among genotypes in their response to A. solani infection in th
e field, greenhouse, and growth chamber experiments. In the field and green
house experiments, disease response varied from near-complete resistance in
some accessions of the wild tomato species L. hirsutum (e.g., PI126445 and
LA2099) to complete susceptibility in tomato cultivar New Yorker and breed
ing line NC84173. The previously developed EB-resistant breeding lines 88B2
31, 89B21, C1943, NCEBR-1, NCEBR-2, NCEBR-5, NCEBR-6, NC24E, and NC39E exhi
bited more resistance than New Yorker and NC84173. Field and greenhouse res
ults were comparable across replications and years, and there were great co
rrespondences (r approximate to 0.71, P < 0.01) between field and greenhous
e resistance across genotypes. In contrast, results from the detached-leafl
et assays were inconsistent across experiments and not correlated with eith
er greenhouse or field results. The overall results indicate the utility of
greenhouse evaluation and the inadequacy of detached-leaflet assay for scr
eening tomatoes for EB resistance.