R. Ranaldi et al., Morphine and amphetamine sensitization in rats demonstrated under moderate- and high-dose NMDA receptor blockade with MK-801 (dizocilpine), PSYCHOPHAR, 151(2-3), 2000, pp. 192-201
Rationale: It has been inferred from indirect tests that MK-801, an NMDA re
ceptor antagonist, blocks sensitization to amphetamine and to morphine. The
se inferences were made from studies where behavioral scores were not recor
ded after each drug treatment in the sensitization protocol. Objectives: We
reinvestigated the role of NMDA receptors in sensitization to amphetamine
or morphine more directly by taking locomotor and stereotypy scores after e
ach of several treatments with MK-801 and amphetamine or morphine. Methods:
Each male Long Evans rat was administered intraperitoneal injections of MK
-801 (0.1 or 0.25 mg/kg) or saline followed 30 minutes later by amphetamine
(0.75 mg/kg), morphine (1.25 mg/kg) or saline and placed immediately in a
photocell chamber. Locomotion and stereotypy were measured simultaneously b
y photobeam breaks and direct observation, respectively. This procedure was
repeated on days 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 11 and 27 for rats receiving amphetamin
e or saline as the second injection and on days 1-10, 13, 16 and 32 for rat
s receiving morphine or saline as their second injection (with no testing o
r treatment on intervening days). Results: The animals treated in the amphe
tamine condition and animals treated in the morphine condition all showed p
rogressively greater locomotion and stereotypy over the first 5 (amphetamin
e) or 10 (morphine) test days; the sensitized response was seen regardless
of whether the animals were pretreated with saline or with MK-801. Thus MK-
801 failed to block the development of psychomotor sensitization seen with
these treatment regimens. When, following initial sensitization, amphetamin
e or morphine was given in the absence of MK-801 (days 8 and 13 for ampheta
mine and morphine rats, respectively), there was no expression of the sensi
tized response; the sensitized response of animals previously treated in th
e MK-801 drug state was expressed only when the animal was tested in the MK
-801 drug state. The sensitized response was still expressed, in animals te
sted in the appropriate drug condition, after a 2-week period in which no d
rugs were given, confirming that the changes underlying this form of sensit
ization were long-lasting and thus probably a consequence of some form of s
ynaptic plasticity Conclusions: Our data provide evidence that behavioral s
ensitization to amphetamine and to morphine can occur despite the presence
of NMDA receptor blockade. These and previous findings suggest that the fai
lure of expression of sensitization seen when MK-801 is withdrawn from a gi
ven psychomotor stimulant treatment regimen reflects, at least in part, the
dependency of sensitization on the various conditions of training rather t
han dependency on some essential function of NMDA receptor activation.