Economists usually assume that monetary incentives improve performance, and
psychologists claim that the opposite may happen. We present and discuss a
set of experiments designed to test these contrasting claims.
We found that the effect of monetary compensation on performance was not mo
notonic. In the treatments in which money was offered, a larger amount yiel
ded a higher performance. However, offering money did not always produce an
improvement: subjects who were offered monetary incentives performed more
poorly than those who were offered no compensation. Several possible interp
retations of the results are discussed.