Fe. Bleeker et al., Direct comparison of the sensitivity of enzyme histochemical and immunohistochemical methods: cathepsin B expression in human colorectal mucosa, ACT HISTOCH, 102(3), 2000, pp. 247-257
Immunohistochemical localization of the proteinase cathepsin B has been com
pared directly with localization of cathepsin B activity with a catalytic (
enzyme) histochemical method. The 2 approaches demonstrate principally diff
erent aspects of an enzyme. The immunohistochemical method localizes the en
zyme protein whether it is active or not whereas the catalytic method visua
lizes the functionally active enzyme only. Sensitivity of both approaches t
o localize low amounts of enzyme protein or activity has never been compare
d. Tn the present study, we show that cathepsin B protein has a wider distr
ibution pattern than cathepsin B activity in human colorectal mucosa, which
means that inactive cathepsin B protein is present. With respect to sensit
ivity of the methods, it is shown that cathepsin B protein could only be de
monstrated properly when strong signal amplification was applied by using N
anogold with silver enhancement, whereas activity could be demonstrated wit
h a simple and direct fluorogenic histochemical assay. It is concluded that
catalytic histochemical methods are relatively simple methods for the loca
lization of activity of enzymes in tissues and cells and that their sensiti
vity is high in comparison with immunohistochemical methods.