Hardly any other bacterial infection can be diagnosed with a similar variet
y of non-invasive and invasive tests as infection with H. pylori. Efficacy
and specificity of well-proven tests such as urease test in biopsy specimen
s, histology, culture, and C-13 breath test have been uniformly evidenced i
n numerous studies. Novel tests include molecular microbiological procedure
s, providing new opportunities for rapid detection of virulence factors and
resistance genes, as well as antigen detection in feces. Though some open
questions still need to be clarified, the latter test will gain major impor
tance in the future.
With the availability of the breath rest and antigen detection in stool the
need for the use of serological tests has bren reduced, all the more so as
the majority of the available quick tests have been shown to be of inadequ
ate reliability. Well defined indications for the treatment of H. pylori in
fections are a major prerequisite for a reasonable use of this diagnostic a
rmory.