HIV prevention efforts for gay and bisexual men in the United States began
as community-mobilizing efforts, but have drifted towards focusing more on
the individual. Given lowering prevalence and incidence, it is unreasonable
to expect continued community support for high levels of prevention activi
ty. Structural and environmental interventions present one useful, compleme
ntary set of alternatives to support prevention efforts. This paper reviews
the gay community's relationship with these interventions, including its i
ntensely debated approaches to reducing HIV transmission within bathhouses.
The implications for HIV prevention for gay men of larger societal factors
, including economic development and economic motivation, migration, and le
gislation, are then considered. Individual rights, community and public-hea
lth interests must be given particularly cautious consideration when design
ing and implementing structural and environmental interventions. (C) 2000 L
ippincott Williams & Wilkins.