Ns. Goldstein et N. Ceniza, Ovarian micropapillary serous borderline tumors - Clinicopathologic features and outcome of seven surgically staged patients, AM J CLIN P, 114(3), 2000, pp. 380-386
Citations number
9
Categorie Soggetti
Research/Laboratory Medicine & Medical Tecnology","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
We report the clinicopathologic findings for 7 patients with completely sta
ged ovarian micropapillary serous borderline tumors (MSBTs) to further clar
ify tremor behavior None of the MSBTs had microinvasion in the ovarian neop
lasm. The MSBT pattern constituted 25% to almost all of the neoplasm. Four
were bilateral, and 6 involved the ovarian surface. Five patients had perit
oneal implants; 2 were invasive, and 3 were noninvasive MSBTs. Distribution
of stages among patients was as follows: IA, 1; IC, 1; IIC, 2; IIIB, 2; an
d IIIC, 1. Median follow-rep was 8.5 years. Four patients were alive and we
ll at the last follow-up visit, including 1 patient with stage IIIC (lymph
node metastases) disease who had noninvasive implants (12 years after surge
ry). One patient who was free of disease died of complications of chemother
apy and abdominal surgery. Two patients died of intra-abdominal neoplastic
growth (stages IIC and IIIB) 5 and 9 years after surgery, respectively; bot
h had invasive implants. Without invasive peritoneal implants, MSBTs seem t
o behave as similar staged nonmicropapillary serous borderline tumors witho
ut invasive peritoneal implants. With invasive peritoneal implants, they se
em to behave as low-grade carcinomas. Pathologists should recognize MSBT as
a neoplasm that can have adverse prognostic features, including invasive p
eritoneal implants.