Is biology destiny? Birth weight and life chances

Citation
D. Conley et Ng. Bennett, Is biology destiny? Birth weight and life chances, AM SOCIOL R, 65(3), 2000, pp. 458-467
Citations number
32
Categorie Soggetti
Sociology & Antropology
Journal title
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW
ISSN journal
00031224 → ACNP
Volume
65
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
458 - 467
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-1224(200006)65:3<458:IBDBWA>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
Two key questions are addressed regarding the intersection of socioeconomic status, biology, and low birth weight over the life course. First, do the income and other socioeconomic conditions of a mother during her pregnancy affect her chances of having a low-birth-weight infant net of her own birth weight, that of the father, and other family-related, unobserved factors? Second, does an individual's birth weight status affect his or her adult li fe chances net of socioeconomic status? These questions have implications f or the way we conceive of the relationship between socioeconomic status and health over the life course, specifically in sorting out causal directiona lity. We use intergenerational data from the Panel Study of income Dynamics , for the years 1968 through 1992. Results of sibling comparisons (family f ixed-effects models) demonstrate that maternal income does not appear to ha ve a significant impact on birth weight. However, low birth weight results in lower educational attainment net of other factors. These findings sugges t that, when considered across generations, causality may not be as straigh tforward as implied by cross-sectional or unigenerational longitudinal stud ies.