St. Colbert et al., An assessment of the value of intraperitoneal meperidine for analgesia postlaparoscopic tubal ligation, ANESTH ANAL, 91(3), 2000, pp. 667-670
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Patients undergoing laparoscopic procedures may experience postoperative pa
in. The intraperitoneal (IP) administration of drugs is controversial but h
as proven effective in some studies for the relief of postoperative pain. H
owever, some investigators have not been able to confirm the analgesic effi
cacy of IP local anesthetics. The administration of TP opioids for the reli
ef of postoperative pain has received little attention. At the end of lapar
oscopic tubal ligation, 100 patients received 80 mL of 0.125% bupivacaine w
ith 1:200,000 epinephrine IP and 50 mg of meperidine either IP or IM. Posto
perative pain scores were measured at rest and with movement. Pain scores w
ere significantly lower in the group receiving the IP meperidine both at re
st (P < 0.01) and with movement (P < 0.05). We conclude that the combinatio
n of intraperitoneal bupivacaine and intraperitoneal meperidine was better
than the combination of IP bupivacaine and IM meperidine for postoperative
analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic tubal ligation.