Contrary to assertions equating the post-Keynesian state with a milita
rized economy, the closure of US military facilities in the 1990s reve
als a fluid, highly contingent politic dynamic that profoundly affects
the landscape of military expenditures. This paper opens with a refut
ation of interpretations that equate post-Keynesianism with militarism
. Next, it examines the geopolitics surrounding closures of military f
acilities, including Pentagon motivations and the sources of local opp
osition. Third, it turns to the geoeconomics of base closures: using i
nput-output analysis, it estimates the total impacts by state attribut
able to the 1988, 1991 and 1993 waves of closures. Finally, it points
to the fruits of alternative uses of such sing military conversion. (C
) 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd.