Objective To examine the impact of laparoscopic nephrectomy and recipient e
ducation on the proportion of kidney recipients who could identify a potent
ial live donor, and on the live donor (LD) transplantation rate,
Summary Background Data Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) results in les
s postoperative surgical pain, a shorter hospital stay, and quicker recover
y than the standard open donor nephrectomy (ODN). The authors hypothesized
that the availability of this less invasive surgical technique would enhanc
e the willingness of family and friends to donate.
Methods The study population consisted of 3,298 end-stage renal disease pat
ients referred for kidney transplant evaluation between November 1991 and F
ebruary 2000, divided into three groups. The first group received no formal
LD education and had only ODN available. The second group received formal
education about the LD process and had only ODN available. The third group
had both formal LD education and LDN avail-able. Records were examined to d
etermine what proportion of each group had any potential donors tissue-type
d, and the rate at which they received an LD transplant.
Results Before LDN availability and formal LD education, only 35.1% of refe
rrals found a potential donor, and only 12.2% received an LD transplant wit
hin 3 years. Institution of a formal education program increased the volunt
eer rate to 39.0%, and 16.5% received an LD transplant. When LDN became ava
ilable, 50% of patients were able to find at least one potential donor, and
within 3 years 24.7% received an LD transplant. Regression analysis indica
ted that availability of LDN was independently associated with a 1.9 relati
ve risk of receiving an LD transplant. Kapian-Meier death-censored 1- and 3
-year graft survival rates for ODN transplants were 95.8% and 90.6%, versus
97.5% and 94.8% for LDN.
Conclusions The availability of LDN and an LD family education program has
doubled the live donor transplantation rate, and outcomes remain excellent.