Increased rates of donation with laparoscopic donor nephrectomy

Citation
Ej. Schweitzer et al., Increased rates of donation with laparoscopic donor nephrectomy, ANN SURG, 232(3), 2000, pp. 392-398
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,"Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
ANNALS OF SURGERY
ISSN journal
00034932 → ACNP
Volume
232
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
392 - 398
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-4932(200009)232:3<392:IRODWL>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
Objective To examine the impact of laparoscopic nephrectomy and recipient e ducation on the proportion of kidney recipients who could identify a potent ial live donor, and on the live donor (LD) transplantation rate, Summary Background Data Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) results in les s postoperative surgical pain, a shorter hospital stay, and quicker recover y than the standard open donor nephrectomy (ODN). The authors hypothesized that the availability of this less invasive surgical technique would enhanc e the willingness of family and friends to donate. Methods The study population consisted of 3,298 end-stage renal disease pat ients referred for kidney transplant evaluation between November 1991 and F ebruary 2000, divided into three groups. The first group received no formal LD education and had only ODN available. The second group received formal education about the LD process and had only ODN available. The third group had both formal LD education and LDN avail-able. Records were examined to d etermine what proportion of each group had any potential donors tissue-type d, and the rate at which they received an LD transplant. Results Before LDN availability and formal LD education, only 35.1% of refe rrals found a potential donor, and only 12.2% received an LD transplant wit hin 3 years. Institution of a formal education program increased the volunt eer rate to 39.0%, and 16.5% received an LD transplant. When LDN became ava ilable, 50% of patients were able to find at least one potential donor, and within 3 years 24.7% received an LD transplant. Regression analysis indica ted that availability of LDN was independently associated with a 1.9 relati ve risk of receiving an LD transplant. Kapian-Meier death-censored 1- and 3 -year graft survival rates for ODN transplants were 95.8% and 90.6%, versus 97.5% and 94.8% for LDN. Conclusions The availability of LDN and an LD family education program has doubled the live donor transplantation rate, and outcomes remain excellent.