Comparison of coronary angiography by the left radial and right femoral approaches with 4 F catheters.

Citation
C. Hudelo et al., Comparison of coronary angiography by the left radial and right femoral approaches with 4 F catheters., ARCH MAL C, 93(7), 2000, pp. 813-819
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems
Journal title
ARCHIVES DES MALADIES DU COEUR ET DES VAISSEAUX
ISSN journal
00039683 → ACNP
Volume
93
Issue
7
Year of publication
2000
Pages
813 - 819
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-9683(200007)93:7<813:COCABT>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
The radial arterial approach has been shown to be valuable for coronary ang ioplasty. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of the left radial and right femoral approaches for diagnostic coronary angiography. The authors performed a prospective non-randomised series of consecutive di agnostic coronary angiogrammes with small calibre (4 french) catheters by t he left radial (100 patients) and right femoral (100 patients) arteries. Th e feasibility, results and complications were compared. The study showed that diagnostic coronary angiography with 4F catheters is feasible with a high success rate, both from the left radial (99%) and righ t femoral (100%) approaches (NS). The duration of the procedure tends to be longer when the radial approach is used (19.2 +/- 1.3 min) than by the fem oral artery (16.3 +/- 1.1 min) (p = 0.06). The duration of irradiation is l onger with the radial approach (6.7 +/- 1.2 vs 4.9 +/- 0.9 min) (p = 0.0001 ). Local complications are minor by either approach (N = 5 vs N = 6 patient s : p = NS), and there were no major complications. The tolerance of the pr ocedure was not as good when the radial artery was used (N = 5) compared wi th the femoral artery (N = 1 patient) because of arterial spasm when the ca theters were changed. The authors conclude that the left radial and right femoral arteries can be used routinely for diagnostic coronary angiography with small catheters (4 French). The left radial approach allows immediate mobilisation of the pat ient but the duration of the procedure and the exposure to irradiation are longer.