Comparison of an enzyme immunoassay for the detection of Helicobacter pylori antigens in the faeces with the urea breath test

Citation
Aj. Shepherd et al., Comparison of an enzyme immunoassay for the detection of Helicobacter pylori antigens in the faeces with the urea breath test, ARCH DIS CH, 83(3), 2000, pp. 268-270
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Pediatrics,"Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD
ISSN journal
00039888 → ACNP
Volume
83
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
268 - 270
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-9888(200009)83:3<268:COAEIF>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
Background-Current diagnostic tests for Helicobacter pylori are invasive (e ndoscopy) or indirect (urea breath test, serology). Aims-To evaluate a new enzyme immunoassay (EIA) which detects H pylori anti gens in faeces, by comparing its sensitivity and specificity in children wi th the C-13 urea breath test (UBT). Methods-A total of 119 children underwent a UBT and provided a faecal sampl e for antigen testing within seven days. After an overnight fast each child provided a pretest breath sample, and samples at 30 and 30 minutes after i ngestion of 100 mg C-13 labelled urea. C-13 enrichment of breath was measur ed by isotope ratio mass spectrometry. Faeces were stored at -70 degrees C until antigen testing, using the EIA. Samples were read spectrophotometrica lly at 450 nm and results were interpreted using recommended cut offs of op tical density <0.14 as negative, greater than or equal to 0.16 as positive, with greater than or equal to 0.14 and <0.16 representing equivocal result s. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated using the manufacturer's cut off compared with UBT. Results-Sensitivity and specificity were 88% and 82%, respectively. Negativ e and positive predictive values were 97% and 58%. Conclusions-The EIA is an alternative, non-invasive, and easy to use method for the detection of H pylori in children. Its high negative predictive va lue suggests a role in screening out uninfected children.