Objective: To evaluate and compare two new commercially available immunotur
bidimetric and immunonephelometric assays for measuring soluble transferrin
receptor (sTfR) in serum. To adapt the immunonephelometric assay to an aut
omated chemistry analyzer.
Design and methods: Total imprecisions and detection limits were calculated
and compared. Fifty-six samples were used for methods comparison. The neph
elometric assay was adapted to the Hitachi 911 analyzer.
Results: Both methods displayed acceptable imprecisions and detection limit
s. Their correlation was good but a proportional bias was observed. The ada
ptation of the nephelometric assay to the Hitachi 911 was successful.
Conclusions: These two new immunoassays are analytically acceptable and mor
e practicable than previously developed methods. The differences observed b
etween both methods underscores the need for standardization, The nephelome
tric assay was easily adaptable to an automated chemistry analyzer. Copyrig
ht (C) 2000 The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists.