Patterns of production and precipitation-use efficiency of winter wheat and native grasslands in the central Great Plains of the United States

Citation
Wk. Lauenroth et al., Patterns of production and precipitation-use efficiency of winter wheat and native grasslands in the central Great Plains of the United States, ECOSYSTEMS, 3(4), 2000, pp. 344-351
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
ECOSYSTEMS
ISSN journal
14329840 → ACNP
Volume
3
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
344 - 351
Database
ISI
SICI code
1432-9840(200007/08)3:4<344:POPAPE>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
The Great Plains of the United States is characterized by a large west-east gradient in annual precipitation and a similar large north-south gradient in annual temperature. Native grasslands and winter wheat are found over a large portion of the precipitation and temperature gradients. In this artic le, we use long-term data to analyze the differences in the patterns in abo veground net primary production and precipitation-use efficiency between wh eat and native grassland ecosystems in the central portion of Great Plains, and their relationships to potential water availability (precipitation). A boveground net primary production of native grasslands shows a large respon se to precipitation. Aboveground net primary production of winter wheat has a smaller response to changing precipitation. Annual precipitation-use eff iciency of native grasslands is unaffected by increases in average annual p recipitation, but precipitation-use efficiency of summer-fallow wheat ecosy stems decreases substantially with increased average precipitation. Our res ults suggest that in the wetter portion of the central Great Plains, summer -fallow wheat management is relatively inefficient, because increased water availability results in diminishing returns. Comparisons with data from co ntinuously cropped wheat confirmed this result. Shifts across the region to continuous cropping of wheat potentially could have significant impacts on regional wheat yield, carbon balance, and economic status.