Are we still performing inappropriate carotid endarterectomy?

Citation
J. Brittenden et Aw. Bradbury, Are we still performing inappropriate carotid endarterectomy?, EUR J VAS E, 20(2), 2000, pp. 158-162
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY
ISSN journal
10785884 → ACNP
Volume
20
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
158 - 162
Database
ISI
SICI code
1078-5884(200008)20:2<158:AWSPIC>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
Objectives: the 1998 ECST final report suggests that the decision to operat ive on patients with greater than 70% symptomatic stenosis should be based on a statistical model incorporating age, ses and degree of stenosis. The a im of this stud was to identify patients operated on the basis of the 1991 reports who would not now be offered surgery according to the 1998 ECST rec ommendation sand to determine the surgical morbidity and mortality arising from these "inappropriate" CEAs. Methods: interrogation of a prospectively gathered database of al CEAs perf ormed for symptomatic stenosis between 1st January 1994 and 1st May 1998. C EAs were classified as "beneficial", "uncertain" or "hazardous" according t o the 1998 ECST recommendations. Results: there were 154 males and 72 females (median age (range) was 67 (39 -85) and 65 (38-81), respectively). In males 101 (66%) of CEAs were "benefi cial", 51 (33%) were "uncertain" and only two (1%) were "hazardous". In wom en, the corresponding proportions were 13 (18%), 45 (63%) and 14 (19%), res pectively. The combined peri-operative major stroke (Rankin 3-5) and death rate was 1.8% (4 patients). Of these, three, one and zero patients were in the "beneficial", "uncertain" and "hazardous" groups. Conclusions: strict adherence to the 1998 ECST recommendations would reduce by 50% the number of CEAs currently performed in this vascular unit and, i n general, would restrict CEA to a higher risk group. The validity of the E CST model requires further evaluation.