Comparing population response to contaminants between laboratory and field: an approach using Daphnia magna ephippial egg banks

Citation
C. Barata et al., Comparing population response to contaminants between laboratory and field: an approach using Daphnia magna ephippial egg banks, FUNCT ECOL, 14(4), 2000, pp. 513-523
Citations number
60
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY
ISSN journal
02698463 → ACNP
Volume
14
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
513 - 523
Database
ISI
SICI code
0269-8463(200008)14:4<513:CPRTCB>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
1. The life-history responses of one field and two laboratory populations o f Daphnia magna were studied under exposure to cadmium and ethyl parathion to assess by how much the response to toxic chemicals of laboratory populat ions with low genetic diversity differs from the response of genetically di verse field populations. 2. The field population was represented by at least 50 unique clones hatche d from resting eggs (ephippia) collected at the beginning of the growing se ason from a temporary water-body located in the north-east Mediterranean Sp anish coast. The laboratory populations were clonal lines established from two geographically and genetically distinct genotypes, which differed in th eir tolerance to cadmium and ethyl parathion. Toxicant effects on the mean and the variance of life-history responses of the laboratory and the field populations were determined. For the field population, toxicant effects on the components of variance of primary fitness traits were also studied. 3. In addition to lethal effects, exposure to cadmium had strong sub-lethal effects on clutch size and age at first reproduction whereas ethyl parathi on only affected juvenile survival. The results reported for life-history r esponses showed that the field population had a similar or greater mean tol erance to cadmium and ethyl parathion than the laboratory populations, but the breadth of its tolerance distribution (measured as the coefficient of v ariation, CV) was higher. Furthermore in contrast with the field population , laboratory populations did not show increased phenotypic plasticity (meas ured as CV) under increasing toxicant exposure. A further analysis of the c omponents of variability for life-history responses of the field population showed that increases in phenotypic plasticity with exposure levels were e xplained by increased levels of genetic variability. 4. These results support the conclusion that as the tolerance of a field po pulation is strongly influenced by genetic factors, the use of genetically homogeneous laboratory populations has limited relevance in predicting long -term responses of field populations to toxic chemicals. However, this conc lusion must remain tentative until further supporting evidence is obtained from this and other species.