Effect of niacin on lipid and lipoprotein levels and glycemic control in patients with diabetes and peripheral arterial disease - The ADMIT Study: A randomized trial
Mb. Elam et al., Effect of niacin on lipid and lipoprotein levels and glycemic control in patients with diabetes and peripheral arterial disease - The ADMIT Study: A randomized trial, J AM MED A, 284(10), 2000, pp. 1263-1270
Citations number
32
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Context Although niacin increases low levels of high-density lipoprotein ch
olesterol (HDL-C), which frequently accompany diabetes, current guidelines
do not recommend use of niacin in patients with diabetes because of concern
s about adverse effects on glycemic control; however, this is based on limi
ted clinical data.
Objective To determine the efficacy and safety of lipid-modifying dosages o
f niacin in patients with diabetes.
Design and Setting Prospective, randomized placebo-controlled clinical tria
l conducted in 6 clinical centers from August 1993 to December 1995.
Participants A total of 468 participants, including 125 with diabetes, who
had diagnosed peripheral arterial disease.
Interventions After an active run-in period, participants were randomly ass
igned to receive niacin (crystalline nicotinic acid), 3000 mg/d or maximum
tolerated dosage (n = 64 with diabetes; n = 173 without diabetes), or place
bo (n = 61 with diabetes; n = 170 without diabetes) for up to 60 weeks (12-
week active run-in and 48-week double-blind).
Main Outcome Measures Plasma lipoprotein, glucose, hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c
)), alanine aminotransferase, and uric acid levels; hypoglycemic drug use:
compliance; and adverse events, in patients with diabetes vs without who we
re receiving niacin vs placebo.
Results Niacin use significantly increased HDL-C by 29% and 29% and decreas
ed triglycerides by 23% and 28% and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LD
L-C) by 8% and 9%, respectively, in participants with and without diabetes
(P<.001 for niacin vs placebo for all). Corresponding changes in participan
ts receiving placebo were increases of 0% and 2% in HDL-C and increases of
7% and 0% in triglycerides, and increases of 1% and 1% in LDL-C, Glucose le
vels were modestly increased by niacin (8.7 and 6.3 mg/dL [0.4 and 0.3 mmol
/L]; P = .04 and P<.001) in participants with and without diabetes, respect
ively. Levels of HbA(1c) were unchanged from baseline to follow-up in parti
cipants with diabetes treated with niacin. In participants with diabetes tr
eated with placebo, HbA(1c) decreased by 0.3 % (P = .04 for difference). Th
ere were no significant differences in niacin discontinuation, niacin dosag
e, or hypoglycemic therapy in participants with diabetes assigned to niacin
vs placebo.
Conclusions Our study suggests that lipid-modifying dosages of niacin can b
e safely used in patients with diabetes and that niacin therapy may be cons
idered as an alternative to statin drugs or fibrates for patients with diab
etes in whom these agents are not tolerated or fail to sufficiently correct
hypertriglyceridemia or low HDL-C levels.