P. Hultmark et al., Cemented first-time revisions of the femoral component - Prospective 7 to 13 years' follow-up using second-generation and third-generation technique, J ARTHROPLA, 15(5), 2000, pp. 551-561
In a prospective, consecutive study of first-time cemented femoral revision
s, 109 hips were evaluated for a minimum of 7 years. There were 87 Charnley
(18 standard, 69 long), 21 Spectron (3 standard, 18 long), and 1 Brunswick
long-stem arthroplasties. There was an increased risk for rerevision in yo
unger patients (P = .0001) and with use of standard stems (P = .002). Facto
rs of importance for development of mechanical failure were younger age (P
= .0001), presence of more pronounced bone defects (P < .005), use of stand
ard stems (P < .0005), and presence of radiolucencies on the postoperative
radiographs (Gruen zones 4 and 6) (P < .01). Our results confirm that cemen
ted femoral revisions are a durable option in elderly patients, when improv
ed cementing techniques and long-stem prostheses are used.