Background: The aim of this study was to compare several methods of hypothe
rmic heart preservation.
Methods: We preserved isolated pig hearts for 24 hours in cold cardioplegia
(4 degrees C), using either continuous microperfusion (Group I) or simple
storage (Group II), and with a new preservative solution (NPS, groups IA an
d IIA) vs St. Thomas' solution (groups IB and IIB). The main characteristic
s of the NPS include (1) prevention of cell swelling with polyethelene glyc
ol (PEG), (2) low calcium and magnesium, and (3) presence of metabolic subs
trates, such as glucose, insulin, pyruvate, aspartate, alanylglutamine, and
membrane stabilization compounds such as ethanol and chlorpromazine.
Results: The 4 above groups were compared with hearts harvested and immedia
tely reperfused (control group). During preservation, only Group IB showed
significant edema (40% +/- 8.4% water gain). Adenylate charge was 25%; to 5
0% higher in microperfused Groups LA and IB (0.678 +/- 0.049 and 0.795 +/-
0.071, respectively) as compared with simple-storage groups IIA and IIB (0.
605 +/- 0.048 and 0.524 +/- 0.160, respectively). Ultrastructural analysis
showed that tissue injury occurred mainly in Group IIB (altered mitochondri
a, chromatin clumping). Functional data showed better recovery of NPS group
s as compared with St. Thomas groups: coronary flow was identical in Group
IB and control (57.8 +/- 22 and 56.6 +/- 14 ml/min/100 g, respectively), an
d in IA > IB (p < 0.001) and IIA > IIB (p < 0.01); the rate pressure produc
ts were higher in NPS groups compared with St. Thomas groups (IA > IB, p <
0.01); IIA > IIB, (p < 0.05).
Conclusions: The microperfusion method associated with the NPS provides exc
ellent protection in long-term hypothermic heart preservation.