The move from a long-stay learning disabilities hospital to community homes: a comparison of clients' nutritional status

Citation
F. Bryan et al., The move from a long-stay learning disabilities hospital to community homes: a comparison of clients' nutritional status, J HUM NU DI, 13(4), 2000, pp. 265-270
Citations number
5
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrynology, Metabolism & Nutrition
Journal title
JOURNAL OF HUMAN NUTRITION AND DIETETICS
ISSN journal
09523871 → ACNP
Volume
13
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
265 - 270
Database
ISI
SICI code
0952-3871(200008)13:4<265:TMFALL>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
Background Adults with learning disabilities have a greater incidence of he alth problems than the general population. It is now well established that they are a nutritionally vulnerable group with polarized weight distributio ns. Aim This study was undertaken to investigate the nutritional consequences o f the closure of a large learning disabilities hospital and the resettlemen t of clients in small community homes. Methods The nutritional changes were measured using a locally devised nutri tion screening form. This had previously been tested for reliability and va lidity. Clients were screened in the month prior to their discharge from Stallingto n Hall and at 1 year post-discharge. The two screening forms for each client were then compared. The screening f orm assessed risk in three areas: nutritional adequacy, weight and nutritio n-related problems. Results A number of significant increases in risk between the two screens w ere seen. In particular, there was an increase in overall risk relating to food groups, unintentional weight gain and loss and overall risk relating t o weight. At the first screen, 70% of the women and 55% of the men were outside the n ormal weight ranges and by the secund screen these percentages had increase d to 82% and 60%, respectively. It was not possible to weigh 15% of the stu dy participants at the second screen because suitable scales were not avail able. Conclusions The study confirms the nutritional vulnerability of the partici pants and highlights a number of adverse nutritional changes. It supports t he need fur regular screening and dietetic input.