D. Melliere et al., MANAGEMENT OF RADIATION-INDUCED OCCLUSIVE ARTERIAL-DISEASE - A REASSESSMENT, Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, 38(3), 1997, pp. 261-269
Background. The goal of this study was to evaluate the operative hazar
ds, therapeutic procedures, and late results of arterial reconstructio
n for radiation-induced occlusive disease. Methods. Twenty-five patien
ts were referred to our institution for radiation-induced occlusive ar
terial disease, Group 1: carotid artery stenosis or occlusion was enco
untered in seven patients. The nine procedures employed included percu
taneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) (n=2), carotid endarterectomy (
n=3), vein or prosthetic bypass (n=4). Group 2: four patients presenti
ng with subclavian and axillary artery occlusion were treated with a c
ommon carotid to brachial artery vein bypass, one after unsuccessful P
TA. Group 3: Thirteen patients had aorto-iliac occlusion. Initial mana
gement included medical treatment (n=1), PTA (n=2), aorto-bifemoral by
pass (n=4), aortofemoral and iliofemoral bypass (n=1 each), axillofemo
ral bypass (n=3), femorofemoral bypass (n=1). Group 4: One patient had
femoral artery occlusion treated with PTA. Results. Group 1: One of t
wo PTA was successful. Endarterectomy or bypass were successful in all
cases. One late vein bypass stenosis was treated by venous patch angi
oplasty, Group 2: All vein bypasses were successful. Group 3: Limb sal
vage was achieved in all patients but eight required repeat operations
for prosthetic sepsis (n=3), restenosis (n=3), or thrombosis (n=12).
Two patients died of late sepsis. Group 4: Outcome after PTA was succe
ssful. Conclusions. 1) Surgery for radiation-induced arterial lesions
is difficult because of arterial, periarterial, and cutaneous sclerosi
s. Some patients, however, are amenable to PTA or endarterectomy. When
bypass is necessary, anastomosis should be performed in healthy arter
ies, for instance, the thoracic aorta for the proximal anastomosis, or
the brachial artery approached through a lateral mid-arm incision. 2)
The risk of early or late graft infection is enhanced by the presence
of tracheostomy, colostomy, or ureterostomy and by repeat operation f
or thrombosis. PTA, endarterectomy, or vein bypass should be preferred
whenever feasible. When prosthetic material is unavoidable, preventio
n of infection should include the use of omentoplasty, remote bypass,
antibiotic-bonded grafts or, in the case of major sepsis, allografts.
3) As restenosis remains a frequent complication, annual clinical and
Duplex-scan surveillance is mandatory.