EXPERIENCE WITH THE USE OF POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE PERICARDIAL MEMBRANE (PRECLUDE PERICARDIAL MEMBRANE) FOR RETROPERITONEAL CLOSURE AFTER ABDOMINAL AORTIC-SURGERY
C. Abad, EXPERIENCE WITH THE USE OF POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE PERICARDIAL MEMBRANE (PRECLUDE PERICARDIAL MEMBRANE) FOR RETROPERITONEAL CLOSURE AFTER ABDOMINAL AORTIC-SURGERY, Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, 38(3), 1997, pp. 283-286
Objective. The purpose of the present publication is to assess the out
come after closure of the retroperitoneum with a patch of polytetraflu
orethylene surgical membrane (Preclude Pericardial Membrane. PPM) afte
r abdominal aortic surgery. Experimental design. Retrospective review
of 7 operated patients with a patch of PPM covering their abdominal ao
rtic synthetic graft. Twenty-five months of follow up. Setting. Instit
utional and University Hospital. Patients and participants. Between Ju
ne 1993 and February 1995, in 7 consecutive male patients (mean age 62
years) a patch of PPM was applied to their retroperitoneum after unde
rgoing surgery in their infrarenal abdominal aorta. One patient had to
tal obliteration of the distal abdominal aorta (Leriche syndrome) and
the remaining 6 had a small infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm measu
ring in trasverse diameter between 4 and 5 centimetres. Interventions.
The patient with Leriche Syndrome had an end to end aorto bifemoral b
ypass graft and the 6 cases with abdominal aortic aneurysm underwent r
esection of the aneurysm plus interposition of a straight vascular gra
ft (3 cases), straight vascular graft and extension with other graft t
o the femoral artery (1 case) and bifurcated aorto-bifemoral graft (2
cases). Measures. Clinical outcome and evolution of the patients, abse
nce of complications derived from the PPM. Results. There was no hospi
tal mortality. All patients are alive after a mean follow-up of 25 mon
ths. Two patients were reoperated in the early postoperative period, o
ne of them required a limited resection of the jejunum, There have bee
n no complications related to the PPM. Conclusions. In order to avoid
secondary aorto-intestinal fistulas, in cases where complete coverage
and isolation of an artificial vascular graft in the abdominal aorta c
an not be achieved, the use of a sheet of PPM separating the arterial
graft from the gastrointestinal system may be an useful alternative.