Aims: The purpose of this study runs to examine the influence of clinician
bins on patients' reports of referred pain. Diagnosis of temporomandibular
disorders is dependent on subjective reports of pain and referred pain upon
manual muscle palpation. The influence of biased clinician statements in s
uch subjective reports has not been previously investigated. Methods: Forty
subjects with pain and who met specific inclusion criteria were randomly a
ssigned to 1 of 2 experimental groups. One group was subjected to a standar
dized biasing statement, while the other group was not. Tender points in th
e masseter muscle were then stimulated with a pressure algometer to the pre
ssure-pain threshold. Subjects then recorded the presence or absence, locat
ion, intensify, and unpleasantness of any referred pain. State-trait anxiet
y and social desirability were also assessed to explore the possibility tha
t anxiety levels or subjects' desires to please the experimental influenced
results. Results: The biased group reported increased presence (P < 0.01),
intensity (P < 0.001), and unpleasantness (P < 0.003) of referred pain as
compared to the,lon-biased group. There were no differences between groups
on state-trait anxiety or social desirability (P > 0.05). Conclusion: These
data suggest that patient reports of pain referral may be subject to clini
cian bias, mid recommendations to control this bias are offered.