How specific is specific impairment?

Objective: To describe the usefulness of impairment items placed at the end of each diagnostic section of a structured instrument (the Diagnostic Inte rview Schedule for Children Version 2.3) in an attempt to link impairment t o specific diagnoses. Method: Data from 3 sites of the Methods for the Epid emiology of Child and Adolescent Mental Disorders Study were used to assess the reliability of the specific impairment measures by diagnosis, the exte nt to which global and specific measures of impairment impact on prevalence rates, the concordance between global and specific impairment, and the deg ree to which there may be a "halo effect" among specific impairment ratings . Results: Test-retest reliability was better for parent than youth ratings . Fewer children were rated as impaired on well-validated global scales tha n on specific impairment ratings, suggesting that the threshold for specifi c ratings needs to be reevaluated. Agreement between specific and global ra tings was poor. Most subjects with 2 or more diagnoses for which impairment was attributed to one diagnosis also had impairment attributed to other di agnoses for which they met symptom criteria, suggesting a halo effect in th ese ratings of specific impairment. Conclusions: Impairment measures are im portant in diagnostic assessments to distinguish those individuals whose ps ychopathology is of clinical significance. Specific impairment ratings used in structured instruments could be improved by including parameters of imp airment that are diagnosis-specific.