Dosage, deletions and dominance: Simple models of the evolution of gene expression

Citation
Ld. Hurst et Jp. Randerson, Dosage, deletions and dominance: Simple models of the evolution of gene expression, J THEOR BIO, 205(4), 2000, pp. 641-647
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Multidisciplinary
Journal title
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY
ISSN journal
00225193 → ACNP
Volume
205
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
641 - 647
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-5193(20000821)205:4<641:DDADSM>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
Dominance of the wild-type allele over spontaneous null mutations, such as deletions, can be explained in terms of the effects of changes in enzyme do se on the flux of metabolic pathways. If ever increasing levels of enzyme a ctivity have ever decreasing effects on the flux of the biochemical pathway , then halving of dosage will always have a lesser effect on flux than half the effect of complete removal of gene activity. Furthermore, if gene expr ession rates are high, then halving of dose can have a negligible effect on flux and dominance will be strong. Given that strong dominance appears to be common, this leaves open the issue of why enzyme activity levels are so high that a halving of expression rates is of minimal effect. Why produce s o much surplus enzyme? One explanation, suggested by Haldane, is that selec tion favoured high expression levels as a defence against mutation. We mode l this scenario formally and show that protection from mutation is an extre mely weak force determining expression levels. The selective coefficients a re only of the order of the mutation rate. However, if we suppose a linear mapping of flux with fitness and a monotonic cost to increased gene express ion, it follows simply that here exists an optimal level of gene expression . By contrast to the mutational model, doubling of gene expression rates wh en the system is distant from the optimum is associated with extremely high selective coefficients (orders of magnitude higher than the mutation rate) . When the cost of gene expression is slight the optimal rate of expression is such that strong dominance will follow. (C) 2000 Academic Press.