Dominance of the wild-type allele over spontaneous null mutations, such as
deletions, can be explained in terms of the effects of changes in enzyme do
se on the flux of metabolic pathways. If ever increasing levels of enzyme a
ctivity have ever decreasing effects on the flux of the biochemical pathway
, then halving of dosage will always have a lesser effect on flux than half
the effect of complete removal of gene activity. Furthermore, if gene expr
ession rates are high, then halving of dose can have a negligible effect on
flux and dominance will be strong. Given that strong dominance appears to
be common, this leaves open the issue of why enzyme activity levels are so
high that a halving of expression rates is of minimal effect. Why produce s
o much surplus enzyme? One explanation, suggested by Haldane, is that selec
tion favoured high expression levels as a defence against mutation. We mode
l this scenario formally and show that protection from mutation is an extre
mely weak force determining expression levels. The selective coefficients a
re only of the order of the mutation rate. However, if we suppose a linear
mapping of flux with fitness and a monotonic cost to increased gene express
ion, it follows simply that here exists an optimal level of gene expression
. By contrast to the mutational model, doubling of gene expression rates wh
en the system is distant from the optimum is associated with extremely high
selective coefficients (orders of magnitude higher than the mutation rate)
. When the cost of gene expression is slight the optimal rate of expression
is such that strong dominance will follow. (C) 2000 Academic Press.