THE SPECIFICITY OF EXERCISE ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY IN WOMEN GROUPED BY ESTROGEN STATUS

Authors
Citation
Ap. Morise et R. Beto, THE SPECIFICITY OF EXERCISE ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY IN WOMEN GROUPED BY ESTROGEN STATUS, International journal of cardiology, 60(1), 1997, pp. 55-65
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiac & Cardiovascular System
ISSN journal
01675273
Volume
60
Issue
1
Year of publication
1997
Pages
55 - 65
Database
ISI
SICI code
0167-5273(1997)60:1<55:TSOEEI>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
We compared the specificity of exercise electrocardiography in 1880 me n and 1818 women with women grouped by menopausal and estrogen replace ment status. Specificity far greater than or equal to 1 mm horizontal or downsloping ST-segment depression was determined using angiography in 781 patients and using two other nonangiography-based methods (a pr etest probability-based method and a predictive accuracy-based method) in all patients. Using angiography, the specificities+/-SE were 84+/- 2 for men, 79+/-3 for women, 81+/-5 for premenopausal women, 81+/-4 fo r postmenopausal women without estrogen replacement, and 77+/-5 for wo men on estrogen replacement. None of these were significantly differen t. For all patients, the respective specificities using the probabilit y and predictive accuracy-based methods were 97+/-1 and 94+/-1 for men , 90+/-1 and 88+/-1 for women, 97+/-1 and 92+/-2 for premenopausal wom en, 92+/-4 and 88+/-3 for postmenopausal women without estrogen replac ement, and 85+/-4 and 81+/-3 for women on estrogen replacement. (Men v s. all women groups except premenopausal women -- P<0.05). Therefore, the premenopausal women had significantly greater specificity than wom en on estrogen replacement (P<0.001) and no difference in specificity with men. Women on estrogen replacement had a significantly lower spec ificity than postmenopausal women not on estrogen replacement (P<0.05) . These results suggest that estrogen replacement therapy and not natu rally occurring estrogen has a role in producing false positive exerci se electrocardiograms in women. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd.