BACKGROUND. Interest in the philosophy and techniques of the assessment of
health outcomes has burgeoned, prompting research funding agencies and othe
rs to examine traditional and emerging methods for outcome measurement.
OBJECTIVES. This report summarizes the presentations and discussions at and
research recommendations stemming from an invitational symposium on health
outcomes methodology convened in September 1999.
RESEARCH DESIGN. The summary is based on the preliminary drafts of all form
al reports and discussions, transcripts of all presentations and plenary di
scussions, and notes from breakout groups.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS. Existing health outcomes measures drawn from class
ic test theory and emerging approaches based on item response theory offer
exciting opportunities for appreciably expanded applications in biomedical
and health services research, clinical practice and decision making, and po
licy development. The major research agenda reflects the significance of th
is field of endeavor, its widening acceptance both at home and abroad, and
its increasing applicability to many different patient and user communities
. Of particular moment are the following: (1) refining and expanding of mea
surement techniques that rely on item response theory and making these appr
oaches more understandable to potential users; (2) improving measurement to
ols to make them more culturally appropriate for diverse populations and mo
re conceptually and psychometrically equivalent across such groups; (3) add
ressing longstanding issues in preference- and utility-based approaches, pa
rticularly in the elicitation of preference responses and scoring instrumen
ts; and (4) enhancing the ways in which data from outcomes measurement tool
s are calibrated against commonly understood clinical and lay metrics, are
interpreted, and are made usable for different decision-makers.