PELVIC FLUID COLLECTIONS BY SONOGRAPHY AND FEBRILE MORBIDITY AFTER ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY

Objective: To assess the range of normal findings at endovaginal sonog raphy after abdominal hysterectomy and to assess the relation between these findings and febrile morbidity. Methods: Fifty-eight women had e ndovaginal ultrasound at a median of 4 days after abdominal hysterecto my. The volume of fluid in the cul-de-sac and its sonographic characte ristics were assessed. Ultrasound findings, which were not released to the patients' physicians, were correlated with febrile morbidity and clinical outcomes. Results: The median pelvic fluid volume was 3.4 mt (interquartile range 0-16.8 mL). No pelvic fluid was detected in 22 of 58 women (37.9%). In the other 36 women, fluid volumes ranged between 0.2 and 76.3 mL. Febrile morbidity was present in 15 of 58 women (26% ) overall: eight of 36 (25%) with and seven of 22 (32%) without pelvic fluid. There was no association between the presence of pelvic fluid collections and febrile morbidity (P = .54) or prolonged fever (P = 1. 00). There was no difference in the median or mean fluid volumes betwe en women with and without febrile morbidity. The study had a power of 90% with alpha = .05 to detect a difference of 20 mL. Even women with fixed, markedly echoic fluid collections larger than 35 mL did not hav e significantly more febrile morbidity than women with no pelvic fluid (P = .33). Conclusion: The volume of pelvic fluid 3-5 days after hyst erectomy does not predict febrile morbidity or the need for drainage. Large or complex fluid collections may be present without adverse clin ical consequences, and discovering such a collection in a patient with febrile morbidity after hysterectomy does not necessitate antibiotic therapy or surgical drainage of the fluid collection. (C) 1997 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.