Cm. Durando et al., Phylogenetic analysis of the repleta species group of the genus Drosophilausing multiple sources of characters, MOL PHYL EV, 16(2), 2000, pp. 296-307
The species in the repleta group of the genus Drosophila have been placed i
nto five subgroups-the mulleri, hydei, mercatorum, repleta, and fasciola su
bgroups. Each subgroup has been further subdivided into complexes and clust
ers. Extensive morphological and cytological analyses of the members of thi
s species group have formed the foundation for the proposed relationships a
mong the members of the repleta species group. Fifty-four taxa, including 4
6 taxa belonging to the repleta species group, were sequenced for fragments
of four genes-16S ribosomal DNA (16S), cytochrome oxidase II (COII), and n
itrogen dehydrogenase 1 (ND1) of the mitochondrial genome and a region of t
he hunchback (hb) nuclear gene. We also generated a partial data set of elo
ngation factor 1-alpha (Ef1 alpha) sequences for a subset of taxa, Our anal
ysis used both DNA characters and chromosomal inversion data. The phylogene
tic hypothesis we obtained supports many of the traditionally accepted clad
es within the mulleri subgroup, but the monophyly of taxonomic groups outsi
de of this subgroup appears not to be supported. Phylogenetic analysis reve
aled one well-supported, highly resolved clade that consists of closely rel
ated members of the mulleri and buzzatii complexes. The remaining taxa, a w
ide assortment of taxonomic groups, ranging from members of other species g
roups to members of several subgroups and members of three species complexe
s from the mulleri subgroup are found in poorly supported arrangements at t
he base of the tree, (C) 2000 Academic Press.