Ks. Virgo et al., Current practice of patient follow-up after potentially curative resectionof cutaneous melanoma, PLAS R SURG, 106(3), 2000, pp. 590-597
Follow-up care for patients who have undergone potentially curative resecti
on of cutaneous melanoma Varies widely among physicians, and the underlying
rationale has not been assessed. To quantify current practice patterns and
to discern motivation, a custom-designed questionnaire was mailed to U.S.
and non-U.S. surgeons, all of whom were members of the American Society of
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (ASPRS). Surveys were mailed to 3032 AS
PRS members, chosen randomly from a total of 4320 members. Of the 1142 ques
tionnaires that were returned, 395 were evaluable. Nonevaluability was usua
lly due to lack of melanoma patients receiving follow-up, in the surgeons'
practices. Surveillance of patients after resection of melanoma relies most
heavily on office visit, chest x-ray, complete blood count, and liver func
tion tests. There was surprisingly little influence of elective node dissec
tion on follow-up practices, imaging tests such as computed tomography, mag
netic resonance imaging, and position emission tomography scan were rarely
employed. Surveillance is motivated by many factors, particularly early det
ection of recurrence of the index melanoma and second primary melanomas. Th
is survey provides information regarding current follow-up strategies recom
mended by ASPRS surgeons after potentially curative resection of cutaneous
melanoma. There is considerable variation in surveillance intensity and in
motivation among practitioners, thus representing a lack of consensus.