In the scanning electron microscope, the surface of wool fibers is much rou
gher than that of mohair or other specialty fibers, mainly due to differenc
es in the frequency and height of the cuticle scales. In order to assess an
d quantify these differences, which are essential for the perception of "ro
ughness" and thus for fast fiber discrimination, mechanical profilometry is
used to assess coarse Merino wool and Texas mohair fibers. The data are an
alyzed by smoothing and Fourier analysis to separate cuticle-related effect
s of roughness from longer term fiber diameter changes attributed mainly to
the characteristic circadian (daily) biological rhythm of the animal. The
results show that subjectively observed differences in the roughness of the
two fiber types are reflected in roughness and frequency parameters obtain
ed from their mechanical profiles, enabling reliable discrimination between
wool and mohair.