Purpose: To assess the role of contrast-enhanced color Doppler US in the di
fferential diagnosis of benign and malignant portal vein thrombosis.
Material and Methods: Fifty-six patients with portal vein thrombosis underw
ent color and power Doppler US examination before and after i.v. injection
of galactose-palmitic acid suspension. The criterion for diagnosing the pre
sence and extension of thrombosis was the lack of visualization of portal v
ein flow in a segment of the portal vein. The criterion for diagnosing mali
gnant portal vein thrombosis was the detection of pulsatile arterial flow e
ither hepatopetal or hepatofugal, in the thrombus. The US data were correla
ted with the types of portal vein thrombosis.
Results: Among the 56 patients, there were 40 benign and 16 malignant porta
l thromboses. Unenhanced Doppler US detected continuous blood flow in 24 be
nign thromboses and pulsatile in 3 malignant thromboses. No flow, either co
ntinuous or pulsatile, was detected in 16 cases with benign thrombosis and
in 13 cases with malignant thrombosis. Contrast-enhanced Doppler US allowed
to assess pulsatile flow in 15 cases with malignant thrombosis (94%). The
use of pulsatile flow as diagnostic criterion of malignant thrombosis yield
ed a sensitivity of 57% and a specificity of 95% with conventional Doppler
US, whereas contrast-enhanced US achieved a sensitivity of 94% and a specif
icity of 100%.
Conclusion: Contrast-enhanced Doppler US is a reliable diagnostic tool for
assessing malignant portal vein thrombosis.