How private contract enforcement mechanisms can succeed where public institutions fail: the case of Juhocukor a.s.

Citation
Hr. Gow et al., How private contract enforcement mechanisms can succeed where public institutions fail: the case of Juhocukor a.s., AGR ECON, 23(3), 2000, pp. 253-265
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture/Agronomy,Economics
Journal title
AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS
ISSN journal
01695150 → ACNP
Volume
23
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
253 - 265
Database
ISI
SICI code
0169-5150(200009)23:3<253:HPCEMC>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
The enforcement of contracts is necessary fur efficient exchange and invest ment in economic activities. Contracts can be enforced through a variety of mechanisms, both public and private. However, in many developing and trans itional countries these public institutions ale either. absent or ineffecti ve in ensuring contract enforcement. Under such conditions, private enforce ment mechanisms may provide a suitable replacement for public enforcement i nstitutions. This may be done externally through a third party or internall y through self-enforcing agreements. This paper analyzes the use of "self-e nforcing" arrangements or "internal" private enforcement mechanisms. Using a case study of an agri-business in a transition economy - Juhocukor a.s., a Slovakian sugar processor - we show that the use of "internal" private co ntract enforcement mechanisms can have a significant positive effect on out put and efficiency for both partners to the exchange transaction in an envi ronment characterized by the absence or ineffectiveness of public enforceme nt institutions. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.