K. Porter et al., Effect of ignoring the time of HIV seroconversion in estimating changes insurvival over calendar time in observational studies: results from CASCADE, AIDS, 14(13), 2000, pp. 1899-1906
Objective: To compare estimates of changes in HIV survival over time derive
d from seroconverter and prevalent cohorts.
Design and methods: Using pooled data from 19 seroconverter cohorts (CASCAD
E), the relative risk of death from HIV seroconversion by calendar time at
risk from 1 January 1991 was examined. The analyses were repeated, ignoring
knowledge of the rime of seroconversion, but adjusting for the CD4 cell co
unt at the time the participant came under observation, thus mimicking a pr
evalent cohort. Estimates from the 'prevalent' cohort approach were compare
d with those obtained from the seroconverter cohort.
Results: Of 5428 subjects at risk on 1 January 1991 or later, 1312 (24.2%)
had died. In the analysis based on time from seroconversion, estimates of t
he effect of calendar year showed marked reductions in mortality in 1997-19
99 only, with no evidence of a linear trend over the period 1991-1996 (P-tr
end = 0.85). Using the prevalent cohort approach a decrease in the relative
risk of death was observed from 1991 to 1998-1999, with a statistically si
gnificant trend of a decrease in risk from 1991 to 1996 (P-trend = 0.002).
Similar findings were observed when the analyses was repeated taking the st
art date of the cohort as 1 January 1988.
Conclusion: Lack of knowledge of HIV infection duration may lead to biased
and exaggerated estimates of survival improvements over time. The adjustmen
t for duration of infection in prevalent HIV cohorts through laboratory mar
kers may compensate inadequately for this. (C) 2000 Lippincott Williams & W
ilkins.