Evidence of recall bias in volunteered vs. prompted responses about occupational exposures

Citation
K. Teschke et al., Evidence of recall bias in volunteered vs. prompted responses about occupational exposures, AM J IND M, 38(4), 2000, pp. 385-388
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Envirnomentale Medicine & Public Health
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE
ISSN journal
02713586 → ACNP
Volume
38
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
385 - 388
Database
ISI
SICI code
0271-3586(200010)38:4<385:EORBIV>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
Background Recall bias remains a concern in case-control studies, although few investigations have found evidence of differential recall. This study e xamined whether differences in occupational exposure reporting occur in vol unteered vs. prompted questionnaire responses. Methods In. a large, population-based case-control study of a childhood can cer neuroblastoma, Mie calculated odds ratios for broad occupational exposu re groups on the assumption that in the absence of recall bias, risk estima tes for such broad groupings should be close to the null value. Results Prompted exposures and work activities showed little evidence of di fferential recall by parents of cases and controls (all OR < 1.2), bur case parents were more likely to volunteer information about other exposures or activities (ORs: 1.35-1.71), Case mothers were also more likely than contr ol mothers to report activities involving indirect exposure (OR = 1.41), Conclusions These findings suggest that prompted exposure questions a-e les s likely to be subject to recall bias than open-ended questions. (C) 2000 W iley-Liss, Inc.