Logical positivism, widely regarded as the received epistemology of psychol
ogy in the first half of the 20th century, was supplanted in the 1960s by v
arious postpositivistic, relativistic philosophies of science, most notably
that of Kuhn. Recently, Laudan, a major figure in the philosophy of scienc
e, developed a novel approach called normative naturalism that provides an
alternative to positivism and relativism. His central thesis is that the tw
o are not always on opposite ends of a continuum but rather have many assum
ptions in common. This article brings Laudan's important views to the atten
tion of psychologists and describes some of the unique implications of thes
e views for the conduct of research and theory in psychology. These implica
tions, which follow from a number of closely reasoned pragmatic arguments,
include more realistic and appropriate evaluation of theory and methodology
than has been suggested by logical positivism or relativism.