Tm. Lapara et al., Phylogenetic analysis of bacterial communities in mesophilic and thermophilic bioreactors treating pharmaceutical wastewater, APPL ENVIR, 66(9), 2000, pp. 3951-3959
phylogenetic diversity of the bacterial communities supported by a seven-st
age, full-scale biological wastewater treatment plant was studied. These re
actors were operated at both mesophilic (28 to 32 degrees C) and thermophil
ic (50 to 58 degrees C) temperatures. Community fingerprint analysis by den
aturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) of the PCR-amplified V3 region
of the 16S rRNA gene from the domain Bacteria revealed that these seven rea
ctors supported three distinct microbial communities. A band-counting analy
sis of the PCR-DGGE results suggested that elevated reactor temperatures co
rresponded with reduced species richness. Cloning of nearly complete 16S rR
NA genes also suggested a reduced species richness in the thermophilic reac
tors by comparing the number of clones with different nucleotide inserts ve
rsus the total number of clones screened. While these results imply that el
evated temperature can reduce species richness, other factors also could ha
ve impacted the number of populations that were detected. Nearly complete 1
6S rDNA sequence analysis showed that the thermophilic reactors mere domina
ted by members from the beta subdivision of the division Proteobacteria (be
ta-proteobacteria) in addition to anaerobic phylotypes from the low-G+C gra
m-positive and Synergistes divisions. The mesophilic reactors, however, inc
luded at least six bacterial divisions, including Cytophaga-Flavobacterium-
Bacteroides, Synergistes, Planctolmycetes, low-G+C gram-positives, Holophag
a-Acido-bacterium, and Proteobacteria (alpha-proteobacteria, beta-proteobac
teria, gamma-proteobacteria and delta-proteobacteria subdivisions). The two
PCR-based techniques detected the presence of similar bacterial population
s hut failed to coincide on the relative distribution of these phylotypes,
This suggested that at least one of these methods is insufficiently quantit
ative to determine total community biodiversity-a function of both the tota
l number of species present (richness) and their relative distribution (eve
nness).