M. Siniatchkin et al., Neurofeedback - The significance of reinforcement and the search for an appropriate strategy for the success of self-regulation, APPL PSY BI, 25(3), 2000, pp. 167-175
Nine healthy children took parr in five sessions of feedback and instrument
al conditioning of slow cortical potentials (SCPs). The feedback conditions
(the relation between the feedback signal and amplitude of SCP) were inver
ted after two sessions. Neither the children nor the therapists were aware
of this change. The adjustment of the children to the new feedback setting
and the self-regulation strategies employed were investigated. The results
were as follows: (a) Healthy children achieved control over cortical negati
vity within two sessions. (b) The change of feedback conditions worsened th
e regulation abilities, which then improved again within the following thre
e sessions. (c) After the first two sessions, the participants were able to
describe strategies that were successful during different phases of self-r
egulation. (d) Following the change in the feedback conditions, the childre
n reevaluated the way they influenced their SCPs, However; they did not alt
er the cognitive or behavioral strategies, The study demonstrated that posi
tive and negative reinforcement and the knowledge of results are more impor
tant for successful self-regulation than the search for effective strategie
s. The relevance of these findings is discussed.