Purpose: With several studies identifying the tourniquet as a factor for in
creased risk of complications in knee arthroscopy, we wished to identify wh
ether its use is necessary. Type of Study: We performed a prospective rando
mized trial on 109 patients undergoing knee arthroscopy. Materials and Meth
ods: All patients had a tourniquet placed on the thigh and were assigned to
either have it inflated or not inflated. Personal information, operative d
erails, postoperative pain scores, analgesic requirements, and complication
s were recorded. Results: The 2 groups were comparable. There was no signif
icant difference between the 2 groups with respect to operative view, durat
ion of operation, pain scores, analgesic requirements, or complications. Th
e tourniquet required intraoperative inflation in 4 patients assigned not t
o have it inflated; in 1 patient, the tourniquet made no difference to the
operative view. Conclusions: Many orthopaedic units continue to use a tourn
iquet routinely for knee arthroscopy, probably in the belief that a clear o
perative view can only be achieved with one. However, the findings in our t
rial indicate that knee arthroscopy may be performed adequately without the
use of a tourniquet. Therefore, we recommend that its routine use for this
: procedure is discontinued.