Ethological confirmatory factor analysis of anxiety-like behaviour in the murine elevated plus-maze

Citation
Pm. Wall et C. Messier, Ethological confirmatory factor analysis of anxiety-like behaviour in the murine elevated plus-maze, BEH BRA RES, 114(1-2), 2000, pp. 199-212
Citations number
52
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
ISSN journal
01664328 → ACNP
Volume
114
Issue
1-2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
199 - 212
Database
ISI
SICI code
0166-4328(200009)114:1-2<199:ECFAOA>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
The elevated plus-maze has been used in animal research to measure anxiety since 1985 and is currently the most widely used animal model of anxiety. S ince this paradigm has been the subject of several principal components ana lyses, it is well qualified for confirmatory factor analysis research. The current report builds on the substantial theoretical knowledge and empirica l data obtained from these structural analyses with a view to obtain furthe r progress in the evolution of our understanding of animal anxiety in the e levated plus-maze. The purpose of the present report was two-fold: (a) to t est if the a piori imposition of a 3-factor model, or a competing 2-factor elevated plus-maze model, would fit our sample (n = 200 CD-1 mice) data in each of two trials within an inferential confirmatory factor analytic frame work; (b) provide a well-fitting model that confers indicator variables tha t can most effectively and parsimoniously measure underlying constructs of elevated plus-maze behaviour. Multiple model-fitting criteria were used, an d issues related to data non-normality, outliers, replicability of the mode l, sampling error and error of approximation ill the estimation of final mo del fit were addressed. The final 2-factor model, with estimated error cova riance between two different pairs of indicator variables, was a good fit o n the trial-1 data, although it was necessary to allow unprotected stretch attends to non-significantly cross-load on factor-2. A 2-factor model also fit the trial-2 data from the present analysis, although it was necessary t o allow closed arm time ratio to negatively cross-load on factor-1. These r esults indicate that inferential hypothesis testing and model building proc edures within a confirmatory factor analysis framework produces interpretab le animal anxiety indices in the elevated plus-maze. Moreover, a 2-factor, rather than a 3-factor model, parsimoniously and unambiguously explained th e underlying constructs of anxiety-like mouse behaviour in the elevated plu s-maze in the present study. Taken together, a reduction in the growing num ber of behavioural indices reported in elevated plus-maze pharmacological s tudies is suggested. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.