The interneurons of the abdominal positioning system of the crayfish - Howthese neurons were established and their use as identified cells and command elements

Authors
Citation
Jl. Larimer, The interneurons of the abdominal positioning system of the crayfish - Howthese neurons were established and their use as identified cells and command elements, BRAIN BEHAV, 55(5), 2000, pp. 241-247
Citations number
48
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
BRAIN BEHAVIOR AND EVOLUTION
ISSN journal
00068977 → ACNP
Volume
55
Issue
5
Year of publication
2000
Pages
241 - 247
Database
ISI
SICI code
0006-8977(200005)55:5<241:TIOTAP>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
Arthropods with segmented abdomens show similar abdominal positioning behav iors. It has been possible to gain some understanding of the neural basis o f these behaviors in lobsters and crayfish using standard intracellular and dye-filling techniques. Typically crayfish and lobsters have six abdominal segments each controlled by a set of flexor and extensor tonic muscles. Ea ch segment has a dozen tonic motor neurons controlled in turn by a large nu mber of interneurons. A similar set of phasic muscles, motor neurons and in terneurons control a fast system. The fast components underlie such behavio rs as escape and swimming. Lucifier-filled microelectrodes were used to sti mulate, record and dye-fill the motor neurons and interneurons of the tonic systems. It was soon apparent that all of these neurons are identifiable. These data allowed us to determine how many interneurons served in a circui t generating a behavior, while the use of pairs of electrodes permitted the study of synaptic interactions between interneurons. Interneurons involved in abdominal positioning produced either flexion (flexion producing intern eurons or FPI), extension (EPI) or inhibition (I). Significantly, FPIs tend ed to synaptically excite other FPIs and inhibit EPIs. In turn EPIs excited other EPIs and inhibited FPIs. As a result, impaling and stimulating an FP I, for example, tended to recruit others and their combined activity evoked a natural-looking behavior. The inhibition between FPI and EPI and vice ve rsa tended to account for the reciprocity seen between the two behaviors in all experiments. Finally the synaptic connections between EPI-EPI on FPI-F PI were found to be essentially invariable. Thus repeated stimulation of an FPI or the stimulation of this same FPI in another preparation, at another time, gave essentially the same overall behavior such that the stimulation of one FPI or EPI could evoke a wide spread output resembling a normal beh avior. Copyright (C) 2000 S. Karger AG. Basel.