Cisplatin-epirubicin-paclitaxel weekly administration with G-CSF support in advanced breast cancer. A Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology group (SICOG) phase II study
G. Frasci et al., Cisplatin-epirubicin-paclitaxel weekly administration with G-CSF support in advanced breast cancer. A Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology group (SICOG) phase II study, BREAST CANC, 62(2), 2000, pp. 87-97
Purpose. It has been shown in vitro that both cisplatin and epirubicin incr
ease the antitumor activity of paclitaxel. Weekly administration could give
a substantial improvement in the therapeutic index of cisplatin and paclit
axel. This study was aimed at defining the antitumor activity of a weekly c
isplatin-epirubicin-paclitaxel (PET) administration in locally advanced or
metastatic breast cancer patients.
Patients and methods. Sixty-eight breast cancer patients with advanced dise
ase, who had not received prior chemotherapy (except adjuvant), received we
ekly cisplatin 30 mg/sqm, paclitaxel 120 mg/sqm and epirubicin 50 mg/sqm pl
us G-CSF (day 3-5), for a maximum of 12 cycles. Thirty-five patients had st
age IIIB and 33 stage IV disease (14 with visceral metastases).
Results. All patients were evaluable for response on an intent to treat bas
is. Overall, 21 complete and 38 partial responses have been recorded for an
87% ORR (95% CI = 76-94%). Fourteen CRs and 19 PRs have been registered in
the 35 patients with locally advanced disease for a 94% ORR (95% CI = 81-9
9%) while 7 CRs and 19 PRs were observed in the 33 patients with metastatic
disease for a 79% ORR (95% CI-61-91%). Surgery was performed in 33/35 wome
n with locally advanced disease. Four of these patients (11%) showed no inv
asive cancer on pathologic examination, and in an additional 8 patients tum
or < 1 cm was found in the breast. Only 4/33 patients who underwent surgery
relapsed. The projected one-year RFS was greater than 80%. At an 11-month
median follow-up (range, 3-19), 11 patients had progressed and 5 had died a
mong the 33 patients with metastatic disease, the median progression-free s
urvival in this group being 14 months. Severe hematologic toxicity was unco
mmon, grade 3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurring in 32% and 4% of
patients, respectively. Only 2 episodes of neutropenic sepsis were registe
red. Packed red blood cell transfusions were required in 7 patients. Vomiti
ng, diarrhoea, mucositis and skin toxicity were severe in 6%, 9%, 10%, and
9% of patients, respectively. Peripheral neuropathy was observed in 47% of
patients.
Conclusions. The weekly PET administration is a well tolerated and very eff
ective approach in advanced breast cancer patients. It can produce a 40% cl
inical complete response rate, with a more than 10% pCR rate in patients wi
th T4 disease, and an about 80% ORR in those with distant metastases. A pha
se III trial comparing PET with a standard every 3 weeks epirubicin-taxol a
dministration is underway.