P. Biro et al., Influence of airway-occluding instruments on airway pressure during jet ventilation for rigid bronchoscopy, BR J ANAEST, 85(3), 2000, pp. 462-465
Citations number
6
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
We measured changes in airway pressure (P-aw) caused by microsurgical instr
uments introduced into a rigid bronchoscope during high frequency jet venti
lation (HFJV), With approval of the institutional Ethics Committee, 10 adul
ts undergoing elective tracheobronchial endoscopy and endosonography during
general anaesthesia were investigated. Inflation of an endosonography prob
e balloon in the left main stem bronchus caused airway obstruction. Pressur
e measurements proximal and distal to the obstruction were compared after t
hree degrees of obstruction (0%, 50% and 90%) acid with two different drivi
ng pressure settings. Airway obstruction increased the mean (SD) peak inspi
ratory pressure (PIP) from 7.5 (2.6) to 9.5 (3.5) mm Hg for 2 atm (P = 0.00
08) and from 9.7 (3.7) to 13.0 (5.1) mm Hg for 3 atm (P = 0.0001). Airway o
bstruction did not alter peripheral PIP (7.2) (4.1) to 7.1 (3.7) mm Hg for
2 atm and 8.8 (4.3) to 9.4 (5.2) mm for 3 atm), but resulted in an end-expi
ratory pressure (EEP) beyond the narrowing being significantly greater than
in the unobstructed airway (2.5 (3.4) to 5.5 (3.7) mm Hg for 2 atm; P = 0.
0005) and 3.2 (3,6) to 8.0 (4.3) mm for 3 atm; P < 0.0001). Severe airway n
arrowing increases inspiratory pressure proximal and expiratory pressure di
stal to the obstruction in relation to the applied driving pressure. Since
the distal EEP never exceeded PIP, even near-total airway obstruction shoul
d not cause severe lung distension or barotrauma in subjects with normal lu
ngs.