Tolerance of early oral feeding following surgery of the lower gastrointestinal tract

Citation
B. Bohm et al., Tolerance of early oral feeding following surgery of the lower gastrointestinal tract, CHIRURG, 71(8), 2000, pp. 955-962
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
CHIRURG
ISSN journal
00094722 → ACNP
Volume
71
Issue
8
Year of publication
2000
Pages
955 - 962
Database
ISI
SICI code
0009-4722(200008)71:8<955:TOEOFF>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
Introduction: Oral feeding is usually offered following surgery of the lowe r gastrointestinal tract when clinical signs of normal intestinal motility are present. However, some studies have shown that early oral feeding is we ll tolerated with low morbidity. Methods: A prospective cohort study was pe rformed to evaluate whether early oral feeding according to a standardized schedule is tolerated under normal clinical circumstances. One hundred cons ecutive patients following small- or large-bowel resection with anastomosis were offered fluids on post-operative day 1, soup on post-operative day 2, mashed food on post-operative day 3 and a regular diet on post-operative d ay 4. Parenteral nutrition was only given if necessary. Tolerance of oral f eeding and the amount of food were checked twice a day. End points of the s tudy were nausea (VAS score 1-100), vomiting (> 200 ml), reinsertion of a n asogastric tube, level of food intake, parenteral nutrition (ml), appetite and well-being. Results. Loop ileostomies were done in 21 patients, colonic resections above the sigmoid in 32, and sigmoid and rectal resections in 4 7. The average age was 63 +/- 13 years. The frequency of nausea was less th an 30% and of vomiting less than 10%. Only in two cases was a nasogastric t ube inserted. Forty-three percent of all patients tolerated feeding very we ll according to the schedule. On post-operative day 3 more than 60% tolerat ed oral intake, on post-operative day 4, 74% and on post-operative day 5, 8 8%. Only 22% of the patients needed parenteral fluids on post-operative day 4. The first bowel movement was noted after 2.8 +/- 1.1 days. Surgical com plications were documented in 18 patients and general complications in 6 pa tients. Conclusion: Most patients tolerated early oral feeding very well ac cording to the schedule with low morbidity. Therefore, early feeding is now a substantial component of the postoperative treatment following small- or large-bowel resections.