Efficacy and safety of quinfamide versus secnidazole in the management of amoebic non-dysenteric colitis in children

Citation
N. Padilla et al., Efficacy and safety of quinfamide versus secnidazole in the management of amoebic non-dysenteric colitis in children, CLIN DRUG I, 20(2), 2000, pp. 89-93
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology,"Pharmacology & Toxicology
Journal title
CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION
ISSN journal
11732563 → ACNP
Volume
20
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
89 - 93
Database
ISI
SICI code
1173-2563(200008)20:2<89:EASOQV>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of single doses of quinfamide and secnidazole in the treatment of amoebic non-dysenteric colitis in chil dren. Design: This was a prospective, longitudinal, double-blind, randomised, com parative study. Setting: The participants were students or relatives of students at two urb an elementary schools in Celaya, Guanajuato, Mexico. Participants: Patients aged between 2 and 15 years of age with cysts of Ent amoeba histolytica in stool samples for 3 consecutive days as detected by F aust's concentration method were enrolled in this study. Interventions and Outcome Measures: Single doses of quinfamide 4.3 mg/kg or secnidazole 30 mg/kg were administered. Patients were asked about the acce ptability of the flavour of the drugs. Efficacy was evaluated by the presen ce or absence of E. histolytica cysts in stool samples on the fifth, sixth and seventh days after administration of the drugs. Adverse events were eva luated by direct questioning of patients. Results: 734 patients were evaluated by coproparasitoscopy, of whom 239 (32 .6%) bad E. histolytica cysts. 112 patients were randomised to receive quin famide and 127 to receive secnidazole. Differences in age, bodyweight, size and gender distribution were not statistically significant between the gro ups. 108 patients (96%) in the quinfamide group and 15 patients (12%) in th e secnidazole group reported the flavour as good (p < 0.0001). 95 patients (85%) in the quinfamide group and 93 patients (73%) in the secnidazole grou p had negative stool samples at the end of treatment (p = 0.04). Nausea (p < 0.0001), abdominal pain (p < 0.05) and unpleasant taste (i.e. metallic ta ste 3 to 5 days after administration of secnidazole) in mouth (p < 0.0001) were more common in the secnidazole group than in the quinfamide group. Conclusions: Quinfamide is an excellent option for amoebic non-dysenteric c olitis because of its high parasitoscopic efficacy, minimum adverse effects and good acceptance by children. The single-dose schedule guarantees compl etion of treatment.