Pm. Lamb et al., Correlation between ultrasound characteristics, mammographic findings and histological grade in patients with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast, CLIN RADIOL, 55(1), 2000, pp. 40-44
AIM: To investigate the relationship between ultrasound characteristics. ma
mmographic findings and histological grade in cases of invasive ductal carc
inoma which produce a mass on ultrasound.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of the imaging f
indings in 120 patients diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma of the bre
ast between January 1996 and December 1997. Imaging findings were correlate
d with the histological grade of tumour.
RESULTS: High-grade tumours were significantly larger both on ultrasound an
d mammography (P < 0.016). A spiculated margin on mammogram was documented
in 72% of low-grade tumours compared with only 24% of high-grade tumours (P
= 0.001), Twenty-two per cent of low-grade tumours had a poorly defined ma
rgin on mammography compared with 66% of high-grade tumours (P = 0.001). At
ultrasound, 16% of high-grade tumours (95% confidence limits 7-29%) had a
well-defined margin. Acoustic enhancement was seen in 36% of high-grade tum
ours compared with only 9% of low and intermediate-grade tumours (P = 0.003
): 22% of all tumours showed acoustic enhancement. Acoustic shadowing was s
een in 71% of low-grade tumours compared with only 28% of high-grade tumour
s (P = 0,003), Malignant-type microcalcification was seen on mammogram in 6
% of low-grade tumours compared with 31% of high-grade tumours (P = 0,045).
CONCLUSION: The classical appearance of a malignant breast mass as a spicul
ated mass on mammogram associated with acoustic shadowing on ultrasound is
more typical of a low-grade tumour, In comparison, high-grade tumours are m
ore likely to demonstrate posterior acoustic enhancement, and a proportion
has a well-defined margin on ultrasound. Therefore, high-grade invasive duc
tal carcinoma may paradoxically display similar imaging features to a benig
n breast mass. (C) 2000 The Royal College of Radiologists.