Mj. Riddoch et al., Neuropsychological evidence distinguishing object selection from action (effector) selection, COGN NEUROP, 17(6), 2000, pp. 547-562
We report two sets of data on object and action selection in a patient, ES,
with an impaired ability to make task-based actions to objects. In simple
action tasks, ES often made familiar actions to objects rather than the act
ion appropriate to the task rule. We show that, despite having impaired sel
ection of action, ES was able to select the target for action (based on sal
ient perceptual differences). Relatively good object selection occurred eve
n when the distractor had a stronger learned response than the target. In a
ddition we show that distractors close to the path of action to a target ca
n compete for, but are rejected from, selection along with any concurrently
activated response. Suppression of an activated response improved performa
nce, when the response would have been inappropriate to the task.